The claim by Michigan-headquartered A123 is looking for a constraining order and an injunction to ban Apple and a previous A123 employee from head hunting other A123 staff and persuading them to leave the battery producer. According to the claim, Apple has lured five top-level researchers, designers and technical administrators from the company since June.
All the recruited A123 workers are specialists in lithium-ion battery innovations, which has prompted hypothesis that Apple is trying to design electric and/or independent autos. But Apple claims otherwise:
“Nothing in the complaint suggests that the individual defendants are working on any product that would compete with any A123 products.”
The current legal dispute outlines the quick changing and progressively competitive industry for electric-auto and autonomous -cars innovative work. The circulation of talent between carmakers and programming/tech organizations isn’t a total surprise considering vehicles are becoming progressively more advanced, digital and even self-sufficient.
Documentary writer and director Chris Paine was quoted commenting on this dynamic:
“I think everybody is all in because nobody wants to get left behind. Everybody understands this is where things are headed.”
In spite of the fact that Apple has not openly admitted working on a new car innovation, the organization’s activities show they’re serious about it, Pain further noted.
A week ago Apple had approached the court for an expansion for its reaction to A123’s claim, saying that it was investigating potential settlement of this matter with offended party. This week’s movement did not give any more info on such a potential resolution.
The complaint claims that Apple’s contracting of the battery producer’s employees has played a significant role in the closing down of different projects/programs at A123. It expressed that such moves suggest Apple’s probable intentions to create a battery branch that is comparative if not identical to A123’s.
This is not the first run tech organizations have been blamed for snatching employees and comparative practices. An antitrust claim recorded in 2013 charged Adobe, Apple, Google and Intel with conspiring avoid the poaching of staff to maintain the wages low. That case is scheduled to come to trial in California on April 9.
Image Source: Computer World